Why did President Trump break his silence amid voting on impeachment motion ..! Know what their big strategy is!
Washington:– After long silence, US President Donald Trump said that he has absolutely no hand in the violence in the US Parliament. Trump has refused to take responsibility for the violent mob intrusion into Parliament House. His statement comes at a time when he is facing the threat of a criminal case with impeachment.
Explain that after the uproar in Capitol Hill, White House legal adviser Pat Cipollon told Trump that he might have to face legal action to incite the riot. That is why it is believed that there is a well thought out strategy behind Trump’s silence. Let us know the opinion of the expert on this issue.
@ Impeachment angry in America due to impeachment: –
President Trump said on the impeachment motion brought against him that for this reason there is tremendous anger among the people of America. President Trump said that what he (Democratic) is doing is a very bad thing. He said that we do not want violence, never. He said that I do not want any violence. His statement came at a time when the US Parliament is to vote on the motion for impeachment brought against Trump. Trump said before leaving for Texas to inspect the wall on the Mexico border that what they are doing is a really terrible thing. We want there to be no violence. Never commit violence.
Trump’s direct reference is to the recent FBI and US National Guard violence-prone statements. Trump has declared a state of emergency in the capital, Washington, until January 24.
What is the strategy behind breaking the silence of @Trump: –
Pro. Harsh Pant (Observer Research Foundation) says that there is a well thought out strategy behind President Trump’s silence. Significantly, there are indications of action under the criminal case on Trump after his impeachment. Earlier it was being speculated that Trump could apologize in this whole matter, but he has changed his strategy. Instead of apologizing for the incident, he is now refusing to take part in the violence. However, before his silence broke, it was believed that Trump had the right to forgive himself. This right of the American President lies in the right to forgive the offender. But there was skepticism over the President’s use of this authority for himself. President Trump has already cleared his stand before any new controversy could arise.
Prof. Pant says that he believes that one thing is proved in the apology that he has confessed to the crime. After this the ball can go to the court of the Supreme Court, but he has cleared his case on the whole case by refusing to be involved in violence. Now if this matter goes ahead, the Democrats will have to prove how Trump is behind this violence.